Baxter v. USA

Filing 16

ORDER denying 12 Motion for Resentencing. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/20/2013. (Carter, J.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT CLYDE BAXTER, a.k.a AChopper@, Petitioner, Case Nos. 3:07cr010 (SRU) 3:09cv368 (SRU) v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RULING ON MOTION FOR RESENTENCING Clyde Baxter, pro se, moves this court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 3582(c)(2), to reconsider his sentence in light of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (“FSA”). A court may upon motion reconsider a sentence when “a sentencing range … [has been] subsequently … lowered by the Sentencing Commission.” 28 U.S.C. ' 3582(c)(2). According to Baxter, his sentencing exposure has dropped because the FSA both reduced the mandatory minimum for certain drug offenses, and narrowed the sentencing disparity between distribution of crack cocaine and powder cocaine. Putting aside the question whether the FSA amendments qualify as reductions under section 3582, Baxter’s motion fails on the merits. The Second Circuit has held that the FSA cannot be applied retroactively to sentences imposed before Congress enacted the statute. In United States v. Diaz, the appeals court explained that FSA did not apply to a defendant who “was convicted and sentenced before the FSA was enacted.” 627 F.3d 930, 930 (2d Cir. 2010). Although the Supreme Court has held that the Act applies to offenders who committed crimes before the FSA’s effective date, but were sentenced after, the Court has not unsettled Diaz’s bright line rule. See Dorsey v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 2321 (2012) (holding that FSA reductions apply to defendants whose conduct occurred before passage of the FSA but who were sentenced after the act went into effect). -1- Baxter was convicted on December 18, 2007, and was sentenced on April 3, 2008—over two years before the passage of the FSA. Because Baxter falls squarely within Diaz’s ambit, his motion (doc. # 12) is denied. It is so ordered. Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 20th day of August 2013. /s/ Stefan R. Underhill Stefan R. Underhill United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?