Biediger et al v. Quinnipiac Univ
Filing
206
ORDER of USCA as to 183 Notice of Appeal filed by Quinnipiac Univ USCA Case Number 10-3302. The parties in this case have filed a stipulation withdrawing this appeal pursuant to Local Rule 42.1. Each party has submitted a separate electronically signed counterpart reflecting the negotiated terms of the stipulation. (Lewis, D)
Biediger et al v. Quinnipiac Univ
Doc. 206
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________________________________ At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the 1st day of December, two thousand and ten,
____________________________________ Quinnipiac University, Defendant - Appellant, v. ORDER Docket Number: 10-3302
Stephanie Biediger, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Kayla Lawler, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Erin Overdevest, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Kristen Corinaldesi, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, L. R., Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Robin L. Sparks, Individually, Logan Riker, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs - Appellees, and, Lesley Riker, on behalf of her minor daughter, Plaintiff. _______________________________________ The parties in the above-referenced case have filed a stipulation withdrawing this appeal pursuant to Local Rule 42.1. Each party has submitted a separate electronically signed counterpart reflecting the negotiated terms of the stipulation.
CERTIFIED COPY ISSUED ON 12/01/2010
Dockets.Justia.com
The stipulations are hereby "So Ordered".
For The Court: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
Anna Greenidge, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?