Biediger et al v. Quinnipiac Univ

Filing 36

Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge Stefan R. Underhill: Motion Hearing held on 5/13/2009 re 35 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law, 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Oral ruling issued by Judge Underhill denying 35 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; taking under advisement 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Total Time: 4 hours and 05 minutes(Court Reporter Susan Catucci.) (Sbalbi, B.)

Download PDF
Civil- (Dec-2008) HONORABLE: Stefan R. Underhill TOTAL TIME: 4 DEPUTY CLERK B. Sbalbi RPTR/ECRO/TAPE S. Catucci 5 hours minutes 05/13/09 DATE: START TIME: 09:30 am END TIME: 01:35 pm LUNCH RECESS FROM: TO: RECESS (if more than hr) FROM: TO: CIVIL NO. 3:09cv621(SRU) Biediger et al. J. Orleans, A. Hernandez, K. Galles Plaintiff's Counsel vs Quinnipiac University M. Gambardella, J. Bardavid Defendant's Counsel COURTROOM MINUTES- CIVIL Motion hearing Evidentiary Hearing Miscellaneous Hearing .....# 2 .....# .....# .....# .....# .....# .....# ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............ Preliminary Injunction Hearing continued until May 14, 2009 Motion for Preliminary Injunction Motion Motion Motion Motion Motion Motion Or al Motion by defendant for judgment as a matter of law Or al Motion Or al Motion Or al Motion Briefs(s) due Proposed Findings due granted granted granted granted granted granted granted granted granted granted granted denied denied denied denied denied denied denied denied denied denied denied Response due filed filed filed filed filed filed at 01:30 pm docketed docketed docketed docketed docketed docketed advisement advisement advisement advisement advisement advisement advisement advisement advisement advisement advisement Show Cause Hearing Judgment Debtor Exam

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?