Tucker v. American Intl Group, Inc et al

Filing 23

ORDER: See attached document. The Court will take no action with respect to the parties' Rule 26(f) report or defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint until their motion to transfer the case has been decided. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on December 30, 2009. (Kleysteuber, R.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT TERI TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. 3:09-cv-01499 (CSH) ORDER HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: Counsel for the parties endorsed a Rule 26(f) report which was entered on the docket on December 17, 2009. [Doc. #16]. Defendants have also moved to transfer the case to Judge Underhill, [Doc. #17], and to dismiss the complaint under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) [Doc. #18]. Both motions were entered on the docket on December 18, 2009. These procedurally bizarre circumstances evoke Stephen Leacock's character: "He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse, and rode off in all directions." Nonsense Novels (1911). The Court will take no action with respect to the parties' Rule 26(f) report or defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint until their motion to transfer the case has been decided. Plaintiff has filed its memorandum in opposition to that motion. [Doc. #20]. The time within which defendants may file a reply brief has not yet elapsed. If no reply brief is submitted, the Court will decide the motion to transfer on the present papers. It is SO ORDERED. Dated: New Haven, Connecticut December 30, 2009 /s/ Charles S. Haight, Jr. Charles S. Haight, Jr. Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?