Nelson v. City of Stamford et al

Filing 186

ORDER severing Edward Nelson's claims from Patricia Nelson's claims. See attached Order. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 1/31/12. (Hildebrand, J.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT EDWARD NELSON and PATRICIA NELSON, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF STAMFORD, et al. Defendants. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09-cv-1690 (VLB) January 31, 2012 ORDER SEVERING CASE AS TO EDWARD NELSON As discussed at length at the show cause hearing on January 19, 2012, Patricia and Edward Nelson’s claims do not arise out of the same nucleus of facts. Assuming Plaintiffs’ factual allegations to be true, they were each arrested in separate locations out of view of the other and they were each subjected to separate booking processes. Accordingly, Plaintiff Edward Nelson’s claims are hereby severed from Plaintiff Patricia Nelson’s claims. Plaintiff Edward Nelson’s claims will be given a new docket number to be directly assigned to Judge Bryant. The filing fee for Edward Nelson’s claims is waived. Edward Nelson shall file, by February 29, 2012, an amended complaint consisting solely of the claims proceeding to trial following the Court’s decision on Summary Judgment, consisting of: (1) Mr. Nelson’s claim of excessive force; (2) Mr. Nelson’s claim of assault and battery, (3) Mr. Nelson’s claim of recklessness and negligence; (4) Mr. Nelson’s claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress; and (5) Mr. Nelson’s claim of negligence against the City of Stamford under Conn. Gen. Stat. §51-557n. IT IS SO ORDERED. _______/s/__________ Hon. Vanessa L. Bryant United States District Judge Dated at Hartford, Connecticut: January 31, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?