Rogers v. Capital One Svc LLC et al
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Capital One Bank and Capital One Services' Motion to Dismiss; granting 22 URS's Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 43 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint. See t he attached Memorandum of Decision. As all claims against Capital One Bank and URS have been dismissed, the Clerk is directed to terminate these defendants from this action. The Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint against Capital One S ervices by February 28, 2011 eliminating his withdrawn claims. For the reasons explained in the attached Memorandum of Decision, leave to amend to assert additional claims under the CCPA is denied as futile. Motions 26 and 27 are denied as moot because they are duplicative of motions 20 and 22 . Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 2/19/11. (Engel, J.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?