Weber v. FUJIFILM Med Sys USA Inc et al

Filing 146

ENDORSEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER denying, as moot 111 Motion for Clarification; granting in part and denying in part 112 Motion to Expedite; granting as to pre filing conference and denying as to 110 Motion to Stay discovery; denying, moot [120 ] Motion for Leave to File; denying, as moot 121 Motion to Dismiss; denying, as moot 123 Motion to Dismiss; denying 132 Motion to Strike ; denying as moot 132 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; granting, 145 Motion for Extension of Time to respond to motion to dismiss [#129]. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 10/5/10. (Torday, B.)

Weber v. FUJIFILM Med Sys USA Inc et al

Doc. 146

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT John J. Weber, Plaintiff, v. FUJIFILM Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc., Hiroaki Tada, FUJIFILM Holdings America Corporation, FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation, and FUJIFILM Corporation, Defendants. October 5, 2009

Civil No. 3:10cv401 (JBA)

ENDORSEMENT ORDER/SCHEDULING ORDER Pursuant to the colloquy with counsel on the record on October 4, 2010, the following is ordered: 1. Defendants' Motion for a Pre­Filing Conference and for a Stay of Discovery [Doc. # 110] is GRANTED in part with respect to Defendant's request for a pre-filing conference, which was held this date. The Motion is WITHDRAWN with respect to the stay of discovery in light of service on FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation on September 21, 2010 under the Hague Convention. Defendants' Motion for an Expedited Hearing on

Defendants' Request for a Pre­Filing Conference and for a Stay of Discovery [Doc. # 112] is also GRANTED in part with respect to Defendants' request for an expedited pre­filing conference, which was held this date. The Motion is WITHDRAWN with respect to the stay of discovery in light of service on FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification and Extension and Approval of Service [Doc. # 111] is DENIED as moot on consent. 3. Defendants' Motion for Leave [Doc. # 120] to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification and Extension and Approval of Service [Doc. # 111] is DENIED as moot.

Dockets.Justia.com

4. Defendant FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 121] Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) is DENIED as moot on consent. 5. Defendant FUJIFILM Corporation's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 123] Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) is DENIED as moot on consent. 6. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike [Doc. # 132] FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation's Second Motion to Dismiss is DENIED for the reasons set out on the record on October 4, 2010. 7. Defendant FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 129] Defendant's Third Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) was filed on September 13, 2010. The following schedule is ordered with respect to the Motion to Dismiss: a. b. Plaintiff's Opposition will be filed by November 11, 2010. Defendant FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation's Reply will be filed by November 22, 2010. c. Oral argument will be held on December 8, 2010 at 9:30 a.m., Courtroom Two, 141 Church Street, New Haven, Connecticut. 8. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time for Expert Disclosure [Doc. # 145] is GRANTED without objection. The following schedule is ordered with respect to expert discovery: a. Defendants will supplement their discovery response on SERP­related issues no later than October 8, 2010. b. c. Plaintiff's SERP expert report will be served by October 29, 2010. The deposition of Plaintiff's SERP expert will be taken by November 2

29, 2010. d. e. Defendants' SERP expert report will be served by December 20, 2010. The deposition of Defendant's SERP expert will be taken by January 19, 2011. 9. Defendant FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation will respond to Plaintiff's discovery requests, including Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions, no later than October 21, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Janet Bond Arterton, U.S.D.J. Dated at New Haven, Connecticut this 5th day of October, 2009.

3