St Louis v. Lantz et al
Minute Entry for Video Conference held before Judge Donna F. Martinez. Total time: 21 minutes. ORDER withdrawing 61 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; finding as moot 65 Motion for Extension of Time; granting in part 67 Motion to Compel; granting 70 Motion for Extension of Time. Dispositive Motions due by 3/15/2013. Status report due 2/20/13. SEE ATTACHED. (Nichols, J.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
CHADWICK J. ST LOUIS,
THERESA C. LANTZ ET AL.,
CASE NO. 3:10CV525(RNC)
MEMORANDUM OF CONFERENCE AND ORDERS ON MOTIONS
On February 14, 2013, Judge Martinez conducted a video
conference with pro se plaintiff Chadwick St. Louis and
defendants' counsel Attorney DeAnn Varunes.
Motion for Preliminary Injunction, doc. #61
Per plaintiff's request at the conference, the Motion for
Preliminary Injunction, doc. #61, is withdrawn.
Motion to Compel, doc. #67
Plaintiff indicated that only one item of discovery remains
He seeks disclosure of redacted captions under some
photographs of a damaged vehicle that defendant previously
(See doc. #68-1 at 48-49.)
that the redacted captions contain the name and number of the
inmate who allegedly damaged the vehicle.
They also indicated
that the redaction is futile because the inmate is identified in
documents that plaintiff obtained prior to this lawsuit and
attached to his complaint.
In light of the foregoing,
plaintiff's Motion to Compel, doc. #67, is granted in part.
Defendants shall disclose the photographs with unredacted
Motion for Extension of Time, doc. #65
Plaintiff's motion for an extension of the discovery
deadline is denied as moot.
Plaintiff has propounded a final
set of discovery requests to which defendants are in the process
No further discovery is necessary.
Motion for Extension of Time, doc. #70
The motion is granted as follows.
Any party may file a
dispositive motion on or before March 15, 2013.
The parties have agreed to confer by telephone to attempt
to resolve the case.
On or before February 20, 2013, defendants
shall submit a letter to chambers (with a copy to plaintiff)
regarding the status of their discussion.
The parties may
request a settlement conference with the court if they believe
that such a conference would be fruitful.
SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connecticut this 14th day of
Donna F. Martinez
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?