Garcia v. Rosario et al

Filing 61

NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT and ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/7/2013. (Oliver, T.)

Garcia v. Rosario et al

Doc. 61

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

BRUCE J. GARCIA
v.

ROSARIO, ET AL.

:
:
:
:
:
:

3:10cv795 (SRU)

NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT AND ORDER
On May 3, 2013, the defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. The plaintiff has
failed to file opposition to such motion within 21 days, as required under Rule 7(a)1, Loc. R. Civ.
P. (D. Conn.). The court hereby gives express notice to the pro se plaintiff that failure to submit
a memorandum in opposition or failure to submit evidence contradicting the defendant’s version
of the facts, may be deemed sufficient cause to grant the motion. See Rule 7(a)1, Loc. R. Civ. P.
(D. Conn.). If no opposition is filed within fourteen (14) days of this notice, the defendants’
motion shall be granted and the case shall be dismissed. See generally Ruotolo v. IRS, 28
F.3d 6, 8 (2d Cir. 1994)(court has obligation to make certain that pro se litigants are aware of the
local rules and understand the consequences of the failure to comply with such rules).
SO ORDERED this 7th day of August 2013 at Bridgeport, Connecticut.

/s/ Stefan R. Underhill
Stefan R. Underhill
United States District Judge

Dockets.Justia.com