Parris v. Pappas et al

Filing 327

ORDER RE: March 18, 2018 Telephone Conference. Signed by Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons on 3/20/18.(Esposito, A.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : : : Civil No. 3:10CV1128 (WWE) : : : : DONNA PARRIS v. CHARLES PAPPAS, ET AL ORDER On October 5, 2017, this Court granted plaintiff’s renewed Motion for Sanctions and Finding for Contempt and ordered Defendant Charles Pappas to pay $800 a month, no later than the 10th of each month, to Attorney Greg Kirschner, Trustee for Ms. Parris. Defendant will file with the Court under seal a proof of payment together with a sworn and notarized monthly statement of income and expenses, along with a copy of his monthly bank statement. This submission will be provided by the 15th of each month with a copy to plaintiff’s counsel. [Doc. #312 at 15, affirmed and adopted on Jan. 3, 2018, Doc. #320]. On March 8, 2018, plaintiff filed a Motion for Finding of Contempt, seeking an order finding Pappas in contempt and confining him until such time as Pappas purges his contempt. [Doc. #322]. A telephone conference was held on March 20, 2018. Defendant’s counsel sought leave to comply with the reporting requirement. The Court granted defendant leave to file documents required by the Court’s ruling, on or before March 30, 2018. After review of the filings, a hearing will be set to permit plaintiff to 1 examine defendant Pappas under oath regarding his income and expenses and his ability to pay, and to hear defendant on why an order of contempt should not enter for defendant’s noncompliance with the Court’s order of October 5, 2017. Should defendant be found in contempt, the Court will consider appropriate sanctions up to and including incarceration to compel compliance. SO ORDERED at Bridgeport, Connecticut this 20th day of March 2018. /s/ _____________ HOLLY B. FITZSIMMONS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?