United Technologies Corp. v. Rolls-Royce

Filing 3

ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 9/27/2010. (Montgomery, A.)

Download PDF
United Technologies Corp. v. Rolls-Royce Doc. 3 United States District Court District of Connecticut Civil Action No. (SRU) E L E C T R O N I C FILING ORDER The Court orders that the parties shall file all documents in this case electronically. The following requirements are imposed: 1. Counsel must comply with all applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the District's Local Rules and the requirements set forth in the District's CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual, and any other rules and administrative procedures that implement the District's CM/ECF system. 2. Unless otherwise ordered, on the business day next following the day on which a document is filed electronically, counsel must provide Chambers with one paper copy of the following e-filed documents: Civil Cases: the following: a. b. c. d. e. f. Applications for temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions or prejudgment remedies; Dispositive motions (motions to dismiss or for summary judgment); Requested jury instructions; Compliance with Pretrial Orders; Trial briefs, including proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law; and Any other filing requested by the court. All pleadings (including briefs and exhibits) supporting or opposing /s/ Stefan R. Underhill Stefan R. Underhill United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?