United Technologies Corp. v. Rolls-Royce
Filing
35
NOTICE: Plaintiff shall, by 12/27/10 report to the Court on the status of service of process. In the absence of satisfactory compliance with this Order, the Court shall, by 1/10/11 enter a dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b) FRCP. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 12/8/10. (Dismissal due 1/10/11, status report due 12/27/10)(Lewis, D)
<![CDATA[
United Technologies Corp. v. Rolls-Royce
Doc. 35
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
United Technologies Corp. v. Rolls-Royce, PLC
: : : : :
3:10cv1523
(SRU)
NOTICE At least thirty (30) days have elapsed from the filing of the Complaint and the issuance of the summons, without return of service. Plaintiff shall, by December 27, 2010 report to the Court on the status of service of process. In the absence of satisfactory compliance with this Order, the Court shall, by January 10, 2011 enter a dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. It is so ordered. Dated at Bridgeport this 8th day of December 2010.
/s/ Stefan R. Underhill Stefan R. Underhill United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
