Murray v. Stratford, et al

Filing 146

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED EXHIBITS (see attached). Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 7/23/2014.(Watson, M.)

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED EXHIBITS IN MURRAY V.
MIRON, 11 CV 629 (JGM)
7/23/14 – On June 19, 2014, the parties filed their Joint Trial Memorandum (Dkt.
#121)["JTM"], in which plaintiff listed 123 proposed exhibits (Exh. 29 is blank). (At 35-63).
For forty-eight of these exhibits (nearly 40% of all the exhibits), defendant reserves his right
to object either because the document had been newly disclosed by plaintiff or was
unfamiliar to defendant. More than one month has passed since the filing of the JTM, and
trial is set to begin in slightly more than two weeks, on August 11, 2014. (Dkt. #114).
Defendant has had more than adequate time to review these forty-eight exhibits and it is
time for him to supplement his responses.
Accordingly, on or before July 28, 2014, defendant shall indicate whether he does not
object, or whether he does object and for what reason, with respect to the following exhibits:
Nos. 4, 5, 7, 8, 14, 18, 22, 28, 49, 53, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 76, 78,
79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 93, 94, 95, 96, 98, 99, 101, 103, 119, 120,
123 and 124.