Louis v. Sanders et al

Filing 17

RULING denying 16 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/26/2011. (Oliver, T.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ANDRE PIERRE LOUIS, Plaintiff, : : : v. : : EQUAL EMPLOYMENT : OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, : ROBERT L. SANDERS and CARLTON : M. HADDEN : Defendant. : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-1088 (JCH) OCTOBER 26, 2011 RULING RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Doc. No. 16) Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 201) is denied under the wellestablished standard for reconsideration. As a motion to reconsider, it fails because his Motion does not establish 1) an intervening change in controlling law; 2) the availability of newly discovered evidence; or 3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice. Local Rules of Civ. P. 7(c); Virgin Atl. Airways , Ltd. v. Nat’l Mediation Bd., 956 F.2d 1245, 1255 (2d Cir. 1992). Accordingly, the court denies plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 16). SO ORDERED. Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut this 26th day of October, 2011. /s/ Janet C. Hall Janet C. Hall United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?