Nowacki v. Malloy et al

Filing 4

ORDER denying with prejudice in part and denying without prejudice in part 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/26/11. (Hungerford, A.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT NOWACKI No. 3:11cv1242 (SRU) v. MALLOY et al. RULING ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER A federal district court has no authority to grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a state court, except where necessary to aid its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments. 28 U.S.C. § 2283. Therefore, the plaintiff’s motion is denied with respect to any claim seeking an injunction against the state courts. The plaintiff’s motion is denied without prejudice to the extent it seeks an injunction against David Abbey and the New Canaan Police Department. The plaintiff may move for that injunction after he has served the defendants and they have been given an opportunity to respond. It is so ordered. Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 26th day of August 2011. /s/ Stefan R. Underhill Stefan R. Underhill United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?