Arnold v. Buck, et al

Filing 15

ORDER denying 4 Motion to Amend/Correct. See attached memorandum of decision. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on March 1, 2012. (Butler, Ayanna)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT WILLIAM ARNOLD, Plaintiff, v. DAVID BUCK, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : PRISONER CASE NO. 3:11-cv-1343 (VLB) RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND [Doc. #4] The plaintiff filed this civil rights action seeking damages from the defendants. On October 21, 2011, he filed a motion to amend his complaint because he neglected to include a prayer for relief in the original complaint. The original complaint includes a prayer for relief. Thus, amendment is not necessary. In addition, instead of submitting a complete amended complaint with his motion, the plaintiff asks the court to append a page to the original complaint. Once a document has been filed, the court cannot alter that document. The plaintiff’s motion to amend [Doc. #4] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Vanessa L. Bryant United States District Judge Dated at Hartford, Connecticut: March 1, 2012.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?