Darazs v. Brighthaupt et al
ORDER denying without prejudice 20 Motion to Amend/Correct. See ORDER, attached. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Smith on February 5, 2013. (Pylman, J.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
CHRISTOPHER MIKE DARAZS,
JON BRIGHTHAUPT, et al.,
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-2019(AVC)
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND
The plaintiff seeks leave to file an amended complaint.
states that he wants to add claims and supplement the factual
allegations of the current claims.
Although the plaintiff refers to an amended complaint, he has
not submitted a proper amended complaint with his motion.
allegations and all claims.
See International Controls Corp. v.
Vesco, 556 F.2d 665, 668 (2d Cir. 1977) (holding that the amended
complaint completely replaces original complaint), cert. denied,
plaintiff are insufficient to enable the court to consider his
request to amend.
The plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend [Doc. #20] is DENIED
accompanied by a proper amended complaint which includes all claims
allegations describing how each defendant participated in the
events underlying his claims. All defendants must be listed in the
The Clerk is directed to send the plaintiff an amended
complaint form with this order.
SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connecticut this
/s/ Thomas P. Smith
THOMAS P. SMITH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?