Doe v. Simonds et al

Filing 35

ORDER denying without prejudice as moot 10 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying without prejudice as moot 11 Motion to Strike; and denying without prejudice as moot 30 Motion to Amend/Correct in light of the pending Motion to Amend Complaint (Dkt. #34). SEE ATTACHED ENDORSEMENT ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. Signed by Judge Joan G. Margolis on 7/13/2012.(Watson, M.)

DOE V. SIMONDS ET AL., 12 CV 508 (JBA)
7/13/12 – ELECTRONIC ENDORSEMENT ORDER: Defendant's Motion for More Definite
Statement, filed 4/30/12 (Dkt. #10), Defendant's Motion to Strike Immaterial and Impertinent
Allegations from the Complaint, filed 4/30/12 (Dkt. #11), and plaintiff's Motion to Amend
Complaint, filed 6/19/12 (Dkt. #30), are ALL DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT, in
light of the pending Motion to Amend Complaint, filed 7/10/12 (Dkt. #34). The issues of
vicarious liability (see Dkt. #10, at 1) and post-1980 assignments of defendant Simonds (see
Dkt. #11, at 1; Dkt. #29, at 2; Dkt. #32, at 3-4) ought to be raised in more substantive
motions.