Smith v. Greater New Haven Transit District et al

Filing 42

ORDER: The defendants' "motion to strike references to Brandon E. Foster as a defendant" 31 is granted. See attached order and ruling. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 2/26/14. (Constantine, A.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MAURICE SMITH, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : GREATER NEW HAVEN TRANSIT : DISTRICT, DONNA K. CARTER, : AL NAUDUS AND TALEIM SALTERS, : : Defendants. : CASE NO. 3:13CV502(RNC) ORDER Pending before the court is the defendant's "Motion to Strike References to Brandon E. Foster as a defendant." (Doc. #31.) The defendants seek to strike references to Brandon Foster because he is not named in the caption of the operative amended complaint (doc. #21) and was not served. Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, entitled "Caption; Names of Parties," states that "[t]he title of the complaint must name all the parties." Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). "This establishes a bright line rule for pleadings." Miro v. Chiusano, No. 05 Civ. 10570(DAB), 2008 WL 2627146, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 1, 2008). "As the Second Circuit has recognized, the Federal Rules require clarity as to the named parties in an action." Acquisition, LLC v. Patel, No. 3:12cv1819(CSH), *3 (D. Conn. Jan. 3, 2013). Weiss 2013 WL 45885, at "Rule 10(a) requires that the caption of the complaint include the names of all of the parties to the action." Hernandez–Avila v. Averill, 725 F.2d 25, 27 (2d Cir. 1984). Because the plaintiff did not list Foster as a defendant in the caption of the complaint as required, Foster is not a defendant in this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). Accordingly the defendants' motion is granted. SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connecticut this 26th day of February, 2014. ___________/s/________________ Donna F. Martinez United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?