Southern Home Care Services, Inc. v. Visiting Nurse Services, Inc. of Southern Connecticut et al
Filing
35
Scheduling Order: A hearing on the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (doc. #5) is scheduled for 10/1/2013 at 10:00 AM in the East Courtroom before Judge Martinez, and shall continue, if necessary, through 10/3/13. See attached order. (Constantine, A.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
SOUTHERN HOME CARE SERVICES
INC. d/b/a RESCARE HOMECARE,
Plaintiff,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
v.
VISITING NURSE SERVICES, INC.
OF SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT,
MAURICE BUNNELL, R.N. and
RHONDA MARSHALL, R.N.,
Defendants.
CASE NO.
3:13cv792(RNC)
SCHEDULING ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
A hearing on the plaintiff's motion for preliminary
injunction (doc. #5) shall be held on October 1, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.
and shall continue, if necessary, on October 2 and October 3, 2013.
2.
Pursuant to the parties' agreement, initial requests for
production of documents and interrogatories will be served on or
after June 28, 2013.
12, 2013.
Initial disclosures will be served on July
Document discovery shall be completed by August 8, 2013.
Deposition of fact witnesses shall be completed by September 13,
2013.
3.
Prior to September 13, 2013, counsel for the parties
shall confer in an attempt to arrive at stipulations of fact and to
agree on exhibits that may be introduced without objection at the
hearing.
3.
By September 19, 2013, each party shall file a memorandum
of law.
In addition to setting forth its version of the facts and
the legal argument in support of its position, each party shall
include in its memorandum a list of witnesses who will testify at
the hearing and a brief description of each witness's testimony.
If a party objects to all or any part of the anticipated testimony
of any witness, the objection and its grounds shall be set forth.
4.
Also by September 19, 2013, the parties shall file a
stipulation of all facts not in dispute.
5.
Also by September 19, 2013, each party shall file a list
of exhibits that will be introduced at the hearing.
The exhibit
list shall denote the exhibit number and a brief description of the
exhibit.
a
The list also shall note whether the parties agree that
particular
exhibit
should
objection at the hearing.
the
proponent
of
the
be
admitted
as
evidence
without
If there is an objection to an exhibit,
exhibit
must
set
forth
the
basis
for
admissibility of the exhibit and the opponent must set forth the
basis of the objection.
Except for rebuttal and impeachment,
exhibits not listed will not be admissible at trial without good
cause shown.
Prior to the beginning of the hearing, each party shall
deliver to the courtroom deputy clerk a copy of the exhibit list,
shall
premark
its
exhibits,
and
shall
deliver
its
premarked
exhibits to the courtroom deputy clerk.
Exhibit stickers are
available from the courtroom deputy clerk.
All exhibits shall be
marked numerically and say “Plaintiff” or “Defendant”.
If there is
more than one plaintiff or defendant, the exhibits shall identify
2
the party offering the exhibit (e.g., Defendant Smith, Exhibit #1).
If the same exhibit is offered by more than one party, the parties
shall mark only one exhibit by placing their respective exhibit
stickers on the one exhibit (e.g., Plaintiff Jones, Exhibit #2;
Defendant Smith Exhibit #5) The parties shall prepare two courtesy
copies of the documentary exhibits for the court’s use during the
hearing.
The courtesy copies shall be arranged in order in a
notebook with tabs bearing the exhibit number.
If possible, the
documentary exhibits of both parties shall be combined into one
notebook.
All copies shall be stamped “Copy” to distinguish them
from the original exhibit.
The “Copy” stamp shall be in a color
other than black to show that the word “copy” is not part of the
exhibit itself.
SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connecticut this 27th day of June,
2013.
________/s/____________________
Donna F. Martinez
United States Magistrate Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?