Southern Home Care Services, Inc. v. Visiting Nurse Services, Inc. of Southern Connecticut et al

Filing 35

Scheduling Order: A hearing on the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (doc. #5) is scheduled for 10/1/2013 at 10:00 AM in the East Courtroom before Judge Martinez, and shall continue, if necessary, through 10/3/13. See attached order. (Constantine, A.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SOUTHERN HOME CARE SERVICES INC. d/b/a RESCARE HOMECARE, Plaintiff, : : : : : : : : : : : : : v. VISITING NURSE SERVICES, INC. OF SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT, MAURICE BUNNELL, R.N. and RHONDA MARSHALL, R.N., Defendants. CASE NO. 3:13cv792(RNC) SCHEDULING ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. A hearing on the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (doc. #5) shall be held on October 1, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. and shall continue, if necessary, on October 2 and October 3, 2013. 2. Pursuant to the parties' agreement, initial requests for production of documents and interrogatories will be served on or after June 28, 2013. 12, 2013. Initial disclosures will be served on July Document discovery shall be completed by August 8, 2013. Deposition of fact witnesses shall be completed by September 13, 2013. 3. Prior to September 13, 2013, counsel for the parties shall confer in an attempt to arrive at stipulations of fact and to agree on exhibits that may be introduced without objection at the hearing. 3. By September 19, 2013, each party shall file a memorandum of law. In addition to setting forth its version of the facts and the legal argument in support of its position, each party shall include in its memorandum a list of witnesses who will testify at the hearing and a brief description of each witness's testimony. If a party objects to all or any part of the anticipated testimony of any witness, the objection and its grounds shall be set forth. 4. Also by September 19, 2013, the parties shall file a stipulation of all facts not in dispute. 5. Also by September 19, 2013, each party shall file a list of exhibits that will be introduced at the hearing. The exhibit list shall denote the exhibit number and a brief description of the exhibit. a The list also shall note whether the parties agree that particular exhibit should objection at the hearing. the proponent of the be admitted as evidence without If there is an objection to an exhibit, exhibit must set forth the basis for admissibility of the exhibit and the opponent must set forth the basis of the objection. Except for rebuttal and impeachment, exhibits not listed will not be admissible at trial without good cause shown. Prior to the beginning of the hearing, each party shall deliver to the courtroom deputy clerk a copy of the exhibit list, shall premark its exhibits, and shall deliver its premarked exhibits to the courtroom deputy clerk. Exhibit stickers are available from the courtroom deputy clerk. All exhibits shall be marked numerically and say “Plaintiff” or “Defendant”. If there is more than one plaintiff or defendant, the exhibits shall identify 2 the party offering the exhibit (e.g., Defendant Smith, Exhibit #1). If the same exhibit is offered by more than one party, the parties shall mark only one exhibit by placing their respective exhibit stickers on the one exhibit (e.g., Plaintiff Jones, Exhibit #2; Defendant Smith Exhibit #5) The parties shall prepare two courtesy copies of the documentary exhibits for the court’s use during the hearing. The courtesy copies shall be arranged in order in a notebook with tabs bearing the exhibit number. If possible, the documentary exhibits of both parties shall be combined into one notebook. All copies shall be stamped “Copy” to distinguish them from the original exhibit. The “Copy” stamp shall be in a color other than black to show that the word “copy” is not part of the exhibit itself. SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connecticut this 27th day of June, 2013. ________/s/____________________ Donna F. Martinez United States Magistrate Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?