Lassen v. Hoyt Livery Inc et al
Filing
160
ORDER denying 145 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/17/2016. (Shin, D.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
ROGER LASSEN, JR., individually and on
behalf of all other similarly situated
individuals,
Plaintiff,
No. 13-cv-01529 (VAB)
v.
HOYT LIVERY, INC., SANTO SILVESTRO,
and LYNDA SILVESTRO,
Defendants.
RULING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR
CERTIFICATION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for limited reconsideration of this
Court’s Order, dated August 5, 2015, granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment,
or in the alternative to certify the Order for interlocutory appeal [Doc. No. 145]. The Motion is
denied.
Defendants seek reconsideration or appeal of a ruling that “deems all ‘waiting time’
potentially at issue in this case to be compensable work time.” Def. Mot. at 1. The Court never
made any such ruling. See Order, Doc. No. 131. Rather, the Court held that “[o]rdinary waiting
time between runs is compensable time.” Id. at 15. The Court also held that “[t]he amount of
damages owed remains to be determined after further proceedings.” Id. at 17.
In deciding the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, “the only question [was] whether
the evidence shows, drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of Defendants, that any plaintiff
worked more than forty hours in any workweek during the relevant period.” Order, Doc. No.
131, at 6. The Court granted partial summary judgment as to liability because there was no
1
genuine issue of fact that “at least some of the drivers worked more than forty hours in a single
workweek on some occasions.” Id. at 7. The Court was not presented with each and every hour
claimed to be compensable by the plaintiffs, and never made the categorical ruling challenged by
Defendants in their present Motion.
Because Defendants seek reconsideration or interlocutory appeal of a ruling this Court
never made, their Motion [Doc. No. 145] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 17th day of May, 2016.
/s/ Victor A. Bolden
Victor A. Bolden
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?