Lewis v. Maldonado et al

Filing 69

ORDER. As set forth in the attached ruling, Plaintiff's motions for 66 ruling and 68 extension of time to file default judgment are DENIED. Plaintiff's 67 motion for extension of time to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss or judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED; Plaintiff shall respond to such motion on or before July 9, 2015. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 5/19/15. (Khan, J)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PRINCE LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. MALDONADO, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : CASE NO. 3:14-cv-437 (MPS) RULING AND ORDER Pending are three motions filed by the plaintiff. First, the plaintiff seeks a ruling on all of his previously submitted motions. All motions filed prior to May 15, 2015, have been ruled on. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion is denied as moot. Second, the plaintiff seeks an extension of time to respond to the defendants’ motion to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings. He states that he is scheduled to be released from custody in late June 2015 and seeks additional time after he release to submit his opposition papers. The plaintiff’s motion is granted. He shall file his opposition to the defendants’ motion on or before July 9, 2 015. Finally, the plaintiff seeks an extension of time to file a motion for default judgment. As the Court has granted the defendants’ motion to set aside default, the plaintiff’s motion is denied. The plaintiff’s motions for ruling [Doc. #66] and extension of time to file a motion for default judgment [Doc. #68] are DENIED. The plaintiff’s motion for extension of time [Doc. #67] to file his opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED. The plaintiff shall file his opposition papers on or before July 9, 2015. SO ORDERED this 19th day of May 2015, at Hartford, Connecticut. /s/ Michael P. Shea United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?