Mourning v. Correction

Filing 24

ORDER directing Petitioner to file a second amended petition by 11/23/2015. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/2/2015.(Dearing, S.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

MICHAEL MOURNING,
Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION,
Respondent.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CASE NO. 3:14cv845 (VAB)

RULING AND ORDER
Petitioner, Michael Mourning, filed this habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
2254 challenging his 2008 conviction for sale of narcotics. Petition, ECF No. 1. Mr. Mourning
included four grounds for relief in his original Petition. Id. Subsequently, he sought leave to
amend his Petition. Mot. to Amend, ECF No. 7. The Motion to Amend addressed the fourth
ground for relief and made no reference to the other three grounds in the original Petition. Id.
The Court granted the motion and directed Mr. Mourning to file an amended petition. Order,
ECF No. 8. The Amended Petition, ECF No. 9, contains only one ground for relief,
prosecutorial misconduct.
The Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss, ECF No. 13, assuming that the Amended
Petition is an addendum to the original Petition. However, an amended petition completely
replaces the original petition. See Beaman v. Yelich, No. 12 Civ. 5304(ALC)(SN), 2014 WL
1813926, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. May 6, 2014) (Report and Recommendation adopted by the District
Court) (petitioner advised that amended petition completely replaces original petition); accord
Gonzalez v. Shahnoon, No. 15-CV-2961(KAM)(LB), 2015 WL 6118528, at *5 (E.D.N.Y. Oct.
16, 2015) (“Once an amended complaint is filed, it completely replaces the original. Therefore,
it is important that plaintiff include in the amended complaint all the necessary information that

was contained in the original complaint.”).
Mr. Mourning was not informed prior to filing his Amended Petition that it must include
all grounds upon which he challenges his conviction. Accordingly, the Court will afford him an
opportunity to set forth in one document all grounds upon which he bases his federal challenge.
In addition, the local court rules require that all habeas petitions be submitted on courtapproved forms. See D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 8(b) (requiring all habeas petitions to be submitted on
court-approved forms). The Amended Petition, ECF No. 9, does not comply with this
requirement. The amended petition that Mr. Mourning files in response to this Order must be
submitted on a court-approved form.
In conclusion, the Clerk is directed to send the petitioner an amended section 2254
habeas petition form with this Order. Mr. Mourning is directed to complete and return the
enclosed amended petition form within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order. He shall
include all of the grounds upon which he challenges his 2008 conviction and respond to all
questions demonstrating how he exhausted his state court remedies with regard to all grounds for
relief. If a second amended petition is not filed by the date specified, the Court will assume that
Mr. Mourning intends to proceed only on the ground of prosecutorial misconduct that appears in
his Amended Petition, ECF No. 9.
SO ORDERED this 2nd day of November 2015, at Bridgeport, Connecticut.
/s/ Victor A. Bolden
Victor A. Bolden
United States District Judge

2