Pitterman et al v. General Motors LLC

Filing 249

DEPOSITION DESIGNATION RULING RE: Deposition of William F. Sultze. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/4/2017. (Bernstein, A.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

BERNARD PITTERMAN et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GENERAL MOTORS LLC,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:14–cv–967 (JCH)
JULY 4, 2017

DEPOSITION DESIGNATION RULING RE: DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM F. SULTZE 1
PAGE / LINE

OBJECTION2

5/11 – 6/1

O/R

8/19 – 8/23

O/R

9/2 – 10/17

O/R

12/6 – 13/4

O/R

24/11 – 24/24 (to “. . . withdrawn.”)

SUST.

25/11 – 26/21

O/R

27/7 – 27/16

SUST.

29/4 – 29/11

O/R

29/24 – 30/4

SUST.

32/6 – 32/11

O/R

33/19 – 33/21

O/R

1

As to each Rule 403 objection, the court weighed the probative value of the deposition
testimony against any prejudicial effect. If the objection was overruled, the court in overruling the
objection found the probative value outweighed the prejudicial effect.
The shorthand “O/R” indicates that the objection to the testimony identified in Column One was
overruled. The shorthand “SUST.” indicates that the objection was sustained.
2

1

33/22 – 34/1

SUST.

34/2 – 34/14

O/R

35/1 – 35/13

SUST.

35/25 – 36/3

O/R

37/20 (first sentence)

SUST.

38/5 – 38/7

O/R

38/8 – 40/19

SUST.

45/15 – 45/24

O/R

47/15 – 47/23

SUST.

48/17 – 49/5

SUST.

49/24 – 50/3

SUST.

50/4 – 50/10

SUST.

50/11 – 50/22

SUST.

68/10 – 68/15

O/R

75/8 – 75/18

SUST.

90/8 – 90/13

SUST.

92/15 – 92/21

SUST.

92/22 – 93/3

O/R

94/19 – 94/25

SUST.

98/4 – 99/13

O/R

104/17 – 104/21

O/R

107/1 – 107/5

O/R

127/9

SUST.

2

130/13

SUST.

SO ORDERED.
Dated at New Haven, Connecticut this 4th day of July, 2017.
/s/ Janet C. Hall
Janet C. Hall
United States District Judge

3