Pitterman et al v. General Motors LLC
Filing
261
AMENDED DEPOSITION DESIGNATION RULING RE: Deposition of Debra Grant. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/6/2017. (Bernstein, A.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
BERNARD PITTERMAN et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GENERAL MOTORS LLC,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:14–cv–967 (JCH)
JULY 6, 2017
AMENDED DEPOSITION DESIGNATION RULING RE: DEPOSITION OF DEBRA
GRANT1
PAGE / LINE
OBJECTION2
4/1 – 4/17
SUST.
5/8 – 7/17
O/R
9/5 – 9/23
SUST.
13/7 – 13/16
O/R
14/22 – 15/5
O/R
21/1
O/R
21/2 – 21/5
SUST.
23/12 – 24/13
O/R
24/14 – 24/16
SUST.
24/17
O/R
25/17 – 26/1
SUST.
1
As to each Rule 403 objection, the court weighed the probative value of the deposition
testimony against any prejudicial effect. If the objection was overruled, the court in overruling the
objection found the probative value outweighed the prejudicial effect.
The shorthand “O/R” indicates that the objection to the testimony identified in Column One was
overruled. The shorthand “SUST.” indicates that the objection was sustained.
2
1
29/15 – 31/7
O/R
43/24 – 44/7
SUST.
44/8 – 46/17
O/R
46/18 – 48/23
SUST.
48/24 –49/8
O/R (Limited: state of mind of witness)
SO ORDERED.
Dated at New Haven, Connecticut this 6th day of July, 2017.
/s/ Janet C. Hall
Janet C. Hall
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?