Sanborn v. Viridian Energy, Inc.

Filing 40

Minute Entry for Proceedings held before Judge Stefan R. Underhill: Motion Hearing held on 4/1/2015 regarding 8 MOTION to Certify Class and to Stay Briefing on Class Certification and 15 MOTION to Dismiss. Oral ruling by Judge Ste fan R. Underhill denying without prejudice 8 MOTION to Certify Class and to Stay Briefing on Class Certification, and denying in substantial part and granting in part 15 MOTION to Dismiss for the reasons provided on the record: The defendant 9;s 15 Motion to Dismiss is denied with respect to the plaintiff's Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) claim, Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act (MCPA) claim, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing clai m; the motion is granted with respect to the plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim. The plaintiff shall file an amended complaint to add a Connecticut plaintiff and to note her exemption from the MCPA's pre-suit notification requirement no later than 45 days from the date of this order. Total Time: 58 minutes (Court Reporter Susan Catucci). (Pannu, C.)

Civil- (Dec-2008)

HONORABLE: Stefan R. Underhill
DEPUTY CLERK Rody Jaiman / C. Pannu RPTR/ECRO/TAPESusan Catucci
hours 58 minutes
DATE: 4/01/2015
START TIME: 12:15 p.m.
END TIME: 1:13 p.m.

TOTAL TIME: 0

LUNCH RECESS
RECESS (if more than ½ hr)

FROM:
FROM:

TO:
TO:

CIVIL NO. 3:14-cv-1731 (SRU)

Lori Sanborn

Robert Izard, Seth Klein

Plaintiff’s Counsel
vs
Daniel Blynn, Ashley Dunn

Viridian Energy, Inc.

Defendant’s Counsel
COURTROOM MINUTES- CIVIL
Motion hearing

Show Cause Hearing

Evidentiary Hearing

Judgment Debtor Exam

Miscellaneous Hearing
.....# 8 Motion to Certify Class & to Stay Briefing re: Class Cert.

granted

denied

advisement

.....# 15 Motion to Dismiss

granted

denied

advisement

.....#

Motion

granted

denied

advisement

.....#

Motion

granted

denied

advisement

.....#

Motion

granted

denied

advisement

.....#

Motion

granted

denied

advisement

.....#

Motion

granted

denied

advisement

.....

Oral Motion

granted

denied

advisement

.....

Oral Motion

granted

denied

advisement

.....

Oral Motion

granted

denied

advisement

Oral Motion

granted

denied

advisement

.....
.....

Briefs(s) due

Proposed Findings due

Response due

............. Motion to Dismiss denied with respect to the plaintiff's CUTPA and MCPA

filed

docketed

............. claims, as well as plaintiff's breach of the implied covenant of good faith and

filed

docketed

............. fair dealing claim; granted with respect to plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim.

filed

docketed

............. The plaintiff shall file an amended complaint regarding her exemption from

filed

docketed

............. the MCPA's pre-suit notification requirement and shall add a Connecticut

filed

docketed

............. plaintiff no later than May 15, 2015 (45 days).
............
Hearing continued until

filed

docketed

at