Sanborn v. Viridian Energy, Inc.

Filing 63

Minute Entry for Proceedings Held Before Judge Stefan R. Underhill: Motion Hearing held on 8/18/2015 regarding 46 Motion to Dismiss and 62 Oral Motion for Extension of Time.Oral ruling by Judge Stefan R. Underhill denying 46 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint and granting 62 Oral Motion for Extension of Time, nunc pro tunc, for the reasons set forth on the record. Total Time: 1 hour and 8 minutes (Court Reporter Susan Catucci). (Pannu, C.)

Download PDF
Civil- (Dec-2008) HONORABLE: Stefan R. Underhill DEPUTY CLERK Rody Jaiman / C. Pannu RPTR/ECRO/TAPESusan Catucci hours 8 minutes DATE: 8/18/2015 START TIME: 9:40 a.m. END TIME: 10:48 a.m. TOTAL TIME: 1 LUNCH RECESS RECESS (if more than ½ hr) FROM: FROM: TO: TO: CIVIL NO. 3:14-cv-1731 (SRU) Lori Sanborn, et al. Robert Izard Plaintiff’s Counsel vs Daniel Blynn, Shahin Rothermel Viridian Energy, Inc. Defendant’s Counsel COURTROOM MINUTES- CIVIL Motion hearing Show Cause Hearing Evidentiary Hearing Judgment Debtor Exam Miscellaneous Hearing .....# 46 Motion to Dismiss granted denied advisement .....# Motion granted denied advisement .....# Motion granted denied advisement .....# Motion granted denied advisement .....# Motion granted denied advisement .....# Motion granted denied advisement .....# Motion granted denied advisement ..... Oral Motion for Extension of Time, nunc pro tunc granted denied advisement ..... Oral Motion granted denied advisement ..... Oral Motion granted denied advisement Oral Motion granted denied advisement ..... ..... Briefs(s) due Proposed Findings due Response due ............. filed docketed ............. filed docketed ............. filed docketed ............. filed docketed ............. filed docketed ............. ............ filed docketed Hearing continued until at

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?