Protegrity USA, Inc. et al v. Netskope, Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER approving 21 Stipulation and ORDER OF TRANSFER: The parties' stipulation is approved; pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(b) and 1406(a), the Clerk shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/13/2015. (Pannu, C.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
PROTEGRITY USA, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.

No. 3:15-cv-230 (SRU)

NETSKOPE, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER OF TRANSFER
On February 18, 2015, plaintiff Protegrity USA, Inc. (“Protegrity”) filed this lawsuit
against defendant Netskope, Inc. (“Netskope”), alleging that Netskope had infringed upon
Protegrity’s patent. Compl. (doc. 1). Shortly thereafter, Netskope moved to dismiss the case for
lack of personal jurisdiction, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), or in the alternative, to transfer this action
to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).
On May 5, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation (doc. 21) in which they consented to transfer this
case to the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, stating that such a transfer
would resolve the parties’ disputes regarding jurisdiction and forum non conveniens.
Accordingly, I approve the parties’ stipulation, and I order that, pursuant to 28 U.S.
Code sections 1404(b) and 1406(a), the Clerk shall transfer this case to the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division.
It is so ordered.
Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 13th day of May 2015.

/s/ STEFAN R. UNDERHILL
Stefan R. Underhill
United States District Judge