Sanchez v. Colvin
GRANTED and SO ORDERED 27 Stipulation for Order for Remand re 19 First MOTION to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner filed by Carmen Sanchez. The parties consent to the entry of a final order and judgment by a Magistrate Judge 27 . The Clerk of the Court will enter judgment. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 10/26/15.(Esposito, A.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
ON BEHALF OF J.J.S.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
Civ. No. 3:15CV00306 (SALM)
October 26, 2015
RULING ON STIPULATION FOR ORDER FOR REMAND
A Stipulation for Order for Remand Under Sentence Four of
42 U.S.C. §405(g) [Doc. #27] is GRANTED and SO ORDERED pursuant
to sentence four of 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
§405(g), with the consent of the plaintiff.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter judgment
affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner’s decision
with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of
Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §405(g),
and in light of the parties’ joint request to remand this action
for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby
reverses the Commissioner’s decision and orders a remand of this
case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v.
Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S.
Upon remand, the Appeals Council will remand this case to
an administrative law judge. The plaintiff will be given an
opportunity for a new hearing and to submit additional evidence
in accordance with 20 C.F.R. §405.331 and 405.350. The ALJ will
issue a new decision.
The clerk of the Court will enter a separate judgment
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
This is not a Recommended Ruling. The parties consented to
the entry of a final order and judgment by a Magistrate Judge on
October 21, 2015. [Doc. #27].
SO ORDERED at New Haven this 26th day of October 2015.
SARAH A. L. MERRIAM
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?