Paslar et al v. Mandara et al
Filing
79
RULING granting 68 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/15/2018. (Lewis, D) Modified on 5/17/2018 (Lewis, D).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
CRISTINA PASLAR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SILVIO MANDARA, et al.,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:16-CV-1645
MAY 15, 2018
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 68)
Defendants Tully Health Center, Stamford Hospital, Stamford Health Medical
Group, Inc., and Stamford Health, Inc. filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on all
claims against them on February 27, 2018. See Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.
No. 68). In it, they argued that the plaintiffs had not disclosed an expert witness to
support a medical negligent claim against them and that the other defendant, Dr. Silvio
Mandara, was not any of their agents. See id. On March 19, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a
Declaration in Response to the Motion for Summary Judgment, acknowledging that their
experts did not identify any deviations from proper medical practice on the part of any
defendant other than Dr. Mandara. See Declaration in Response to the Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 72) at ¶¶ 9, 11. The plaintiffs took no position in
response to the Motion for Summary Judgment. See id. at ¶ 12. They further
represented to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector that they do not oppose the Motion
for Summary Judgment.
Accordingly, absent objection, the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 68)
is GRANTED.
1
SO ORDERED.
Dated at New Haven, Connecticut this 15th day of May, 2018.
/s/ Janet C. Hall
________
Janet C. Hall
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?