Kambo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 34

ORDER TO AMEND CASE CAPTION: For the reasons explained in the attached Order to Amend Case Caption, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to amend the docket and case caption to reflect that Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is now the named Defendant in this action. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 7/9/2019. (Baran, Hugh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ILIR KAMBO, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:17-cv-992 (VAB) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER TO AMEND CASE CAPTION Sworn in on June 17, 2019, Andrew M. Saul is now the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.1 Under Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, when a party in an official capacity resigns or otherwise ceases to hold office while the action is pending, the officer’s successor is automatically substituted as a party, regardless of the party’s failure to so move or to amend the case caption. FED. R. CIV. P. 25(d). The Court also may also order the substitution of a party at any time. See Williams v. Annucci, 895 F.3d 180, 187 (2d Cir. 2018); Tanvir v. Tanzin, 894 F.3d 449, 459 n.7 (2d Cir. 2018). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to amend the docket and case caption to reflect that Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is now the named Defendant in this action. SO ORDERED at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 9th day of July, 2019. /s/ Victor A. Bolden VICTOR A. BOLDEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE                                                              1 See Commissioner Bio, accessed Jul. 9, 2019, https://www.ssa.gov/agency/commissioner.html; Press Release, Social Security Administration, Social Security Welcomes its New Commissioner (Jun. 17, 2019), https://blog.ssa.gov/social-security-welcomes-its-new-commissioner/.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?