Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe

Filing 10

ORDER re 9 Order on Motion for Leave to Serve Third Party Subpoena Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 11/30/2017. (Schneider, K)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.

No. 3:17-cv-1953 (SRU)

JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address
68.9.36.150,
Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING LEAVE TO SERVE
THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE
Plaintiff Malibu Media LLC alleges that defendant John Doe, identified only by his IP
address, committed copyright infringement by distributing plaintiff’s adult films using
BitTorrent, a peer-to-peer file distribution network. Doc. #1. Plaintiff moved pursuant to Fed R.
Civ. P. 26(d)(1) for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on defendant’s internet service provider
(“ISP”) for the limited purpose of discovering defendant’s identity; only with defendant’s
identity will plaintiff be able to serve defendant with process and proceed with the case. Doc. #
7. For substantially the reasons set forth in plaintiff’s motion and supporting documents, I
granted the motion, having concluded that plaintiff has established good cause for entry of this
order. Doc. # 9. I write now only to clarify the scope and limitations of my prior order.
Plaintiff acknowledges the concerns raised by many courts around the nation that, given
the nature of the films allegedly distributed by defendants, defendants may feel coerced to settle
these suits merely to prevent public disclosure of defendants’ identifying information.1 See, e.g.,
Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, 2015 WL 4092417 (S.D.N.Y. July 6, 2015); Malibu Media, LLC v.

1

Plaintiff consents to conditions in this order prohibiting it from initiating a settlement with defendant prior to
serving him with the complaint, as well as an order allowing defendant to proceed anonymously. Doc. #7-1 at 4–5.

Doe, 2015 WL 1780965 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 10, 2015); Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, 2015 WL
4923114 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2015). I share those concerns. This order is therefore subject to the
following conditions and limitations:
1.

Plaintiff may subpoena defendant’s ISP only to obtain defendant’s name and
address, but not defendant’s e-mail addresses or telephone numbers. Plaintiff may
only use defendant’s name and address, if obtained by defendant’s ISP, for the
purposes of this litigation; plaintiff is ordered not to disclose defendant’s name or
address, or any other identifying information other than defendant’s ISP number,
that plaintiff may subsequently learn. Plaintiff shall not threaten to disclose any of
defendant’s identifying information. Defendant will be permitted to litigate this
case anonymously unless and until this Court orders otherwise and only after
defendant has had an opportunity to challenge the disclosure. Therefore, plaintiff
is ordered not to publicly file any of defendant’s identifying information and to
file all documents containing defendant’s identifying information under seal.

2.

Plaintiff may immediately serve a Rule 45 subpoena on defendant’s ISP to obtain
defendant’s name and current and permanent address. Plaintiff shall serve
defendant’s ISP with a copy of the complaint, this Order, and the subpoena.

3.

After having been served with the subpoena, the ISP will delay producing to
plaintiff the subpoenaed information until after it has provided defendant John
Doe with:
a. Notice that this suit has been filed naming defendant as the one who
allegedly downloaded copyright protected work;
b. A copy of the subpoena, the complaint filed in this lawsuit, and this Order;
and
c. Notice that the ISP will comply with the subpoena and produce to plaintiff
the information sought in the subpoena unless, within 60 days of service
of the subpoena on defendant by the ISP, defendant files a motion to quash
the subpoena or for other appropriate relief in this Court. If a timely
motion to quash is filed, the ISP shall not produce the subpoenaed
information until the Court acts on the motion.

4.

Defendant’s ISP will have 60 days from the date of service of the Rule 45
subpoena upon it to serve defendant John Doe with a copy of the complaint, this
Order, and the subpoena. The ISP may serve defendant John Doe using any
reasonable means, including written notice sent to his or her last known address,
transmitted either by first class mail or via overnight service.

5.

Defendant John Doe shall have 60 days from the date of service of the Rule 45
subpoena and this Order upon him to file any motions with this Court contesting
2

the subpoena (including a motion to quash or modify the subpoena), as well as
any request to litigate the subpoena anonymously. The ISP may not turn over the
identifying information of defendant to plaintiff before the expiration of that 60day period. Additionally, if defendant or the ISP files a motion to quash or modify
the subpoena, or a request to litigate the subpoena anonymously, the ISP may not
turn over any information to plaintiff until the issues have been addressed and the
Court issues an order instructing the ISP to resume turning over the requested
discovery.
6.

Defendant’s ISP shall preserve any subpoenaed information pending the
resolution of any timely filed motion to quash.

7.

Defendant’s ISP shall confer with plaintiff and shall not assess any charge in
advance of providing the information requested in the subpoena. If defendant’s
ISP receives a subpoena and elects to charge for the costs of production, it shall
provide a billing summary and cost report to plaintiff.

8.

Any information ultimately disclosed to plaintiff in response to a Rule 45
subpoena may be used by plaintiff solely for the purpose of protecting plaintiff's
rights as set forth in its complaint.

It is so ordered.
Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 30th day of November 2017.
/s/STEFAN R. UNDERHILL
Stefan R. Underhill
United States District Judge

3