Eisenlohr et al v. Connecticut et al

Filing 12

ORDER denying 11 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 11 Motion for Relief from Judgment. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/21/18. (Kaas, E.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PAMELA DUDGEON EISENLOHR, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 3:17-cv-2174 (SRU) v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT, et al., Defendants. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION Pamela Dudgeon Eisenlohr1 initiated this action in December 2017 against fifty-five defendants, most of whom are state agencies, current or retired state judges, law firms, and attorneys. She alleges violations of her rights under the Americans with Disability Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act stemming from her state court divorce and child custody proceedings. See Compl., Doc. No. 1. Eisenlohr moved to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted by Magistrate Judge William I. Garfinkel on January 24, 2018. See Doc. No. 7. Judge Garfinkel also issued a Recommended Ruling, recommending that I dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Recommended Ruling, Doc. No. 8. Eisenlohr objected to the recommendation. See Objection, Doc. No. 8. I approved and adopted Judge Garfinkel’s Recommended Ruling and closed the case. Order, Doc. No. 10. Eisenlohr has now moved to amend the judgment and/or for relief from the judgment. Motion, Doc. No. 11. As set forth in the Recommended Ruling, federal courts lack jurisdiction in cases such as this pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which precludes a party who lost her state court case from seeking review of the judgment in federal district court. See Rooker v. 1 Eisenlohr also brought this action as next friend and parent on behalf of “S.D.E.,” a minor. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 414-15 (1923), District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 486 (1983). Accordingly, Eisenlohr’s motion (Doc. No. 11) is denied. So ordered. Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 21st day of August 2018. /s/ STEFAN R. UNDERHILL Stefan R. Underhill United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?