Elliott-Sims v. Berryhill et al

Filing 18

ORDER granting 17 Consent MOTION to Remand to Agency. The Clerk shall enter a judgment of reversal and remand under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and shall remand the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the motion. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 04/24/2018. (Jamieson, K)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT KAREN ANN ELLIOTT-SIMS, Plaintiff, No. 3:18-cv-00016 (SRU) v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, performing the duties and functions not reserved to the Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING COMMISSIONER’S CONSENT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WITH REVERSAL AND REMAND The defendant, Nancy A. Berryhill, Deputy Commissioner for Operations—performing the duties and functions not reserved to the Commissioner of Social Security—has moved to enter judgment under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), with a reversal and remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further action. Counsel for the Commissioner represents that she has contacted counsel for the plaintiff, Karen Ann Elliott-Sims, who consents to the relief sought in this motion. Under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), I have the power to enter a judgment with a reversal and remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 297 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 98 (1991). Remand for further development of the record is appropriate when gaps exist in the administrative record or when the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) committed legal error. See Parker v. Harris, 626 F.2d 225, 235 (2d Cir. 1980). Here, the Commissioner has determined that remand of this case for additional administrative proceedings is necessary. Upon remand, the Social Security Administration Appeals Counsel will remand this case to an ALJ. The plaintiff will be given an opportunity for a new hearing and to submit additional evidence in accordance with 20 C.F.R. §§ 405.331 & 405.350. The ALJ shall reassess plaintiff’s maximum residual functional capacity, and reevaluate the medical and other opinions of record. The ALJ shall also obtain vocational expert testimony to determine whether plaintiff can perform past relevant work and/or make an adjustment to other work that exists in significant numbers. The ALJ shall then issue a new decision. Accordingly, I GRANT the Commissioner’s Consent Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) [Doc. No. 17]. The Clerk shall enter a judgment of reversal and remand under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and shall remand the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the motion. The Clerk is further instructed that, if any party subsequently appeals to this court the decision made after remand, that Social Security appeal shall be assigned to me (as the District Judge who issued the ruling that remanded the case). So ordered. Dated at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 24th day of April 2018. /s/ STEFAN R. UNDERHILL Stefan R. Underhill United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?