Young v. Warden

Filing 14

ORDER denying 6 , 10 , and 12 Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See attached Ruling and Order. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/26/2024. (Alquesta, S)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
LISA YOUNG
Petitioner,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

v.
WARDEN
Respondent.

CASE NO. 3:24-cv-01264 (KAD)

SEPTEMBER 26, 2024

RULING AND ORDER
Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge:
Before the Court are Lisa Young’s Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”)
at ECF Nos. 6, 10, and 12, requesting to proceed in her habeas action without paying the $5 filing
fee. For the following reasons, these motions are DENIED.
It is well settled that the decision to proceed in forma pauperis in civil cases is committed
to the sound discretion of the district court. See Rahimi v. Sec’y of Navy, No. 3:19-CV-01852
(JAM), 2019 WL 6529458, at *2 (D. Conn. Dec. 4, 2019). In exercising this discretion, the court
must determine whether the burden of paying the fees for filing and service would either hamper
the petitioner’s ability to obtain the necessities of life or force her to abandon the action. Adkins v.
E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339–40 (1948); Potnick v. E. State Hosp., 701 F.2d
243, 244 (2d Cir. 1983) (per curiam).
Young’s motions, read together, show she receives no money from employment or
investments, has no assets, monthly expenses, or debts, and does not support any dependents. See
ECF Nos. 6, 10, 12. Young’s trust fund account statement dated September 7, 2024, shows she
spent $372.10 from her trust fund account from August 8, 2024, to September 5, 2024. See ECF
No. 13. The source of those funds is unknown, but Young received a $100 Western Union wire

transfer as recently as September 2, 2024. See id. Young’s trust fund account balance as of
September 7, 2024, was $88.71.
In short, Young’s current trust fund balance of $88.71 and her recent account history shows
that she can pay the $5 filing fee without forgoing life’s necessities or causing her to abandon the
action. Accordingly, Young’s Motions for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis at ECF Nos. 6,
10, and 12 are DENIED. See Clark v. Pappoosha, No. 3:21CV1690 (CSH), 2022 WL 960296, at
*2 (D. Conn. Mar. 30, 2022) (finding that plaintiff could pay the $402 filing fee when he had
$492.70 in his trust account).
All further proceedings in this matter shall be held in abeyance for thirty (30) days pending
the Plaintiff’s delivery of the filing fee in the amount of $5 (money order or bank check made
payable to the Clerk of Court) to the Clerk’s Office, 915 Lafayette Boulevard, Bridgeport, CT
06604.
Failure to tender the filing fee on or before October 26, 2024, will result in the dismissal
of this action.
SO ORDERED at Bridgeport, Connecticut, this 26th day of September, 2024.
/s/ Kari A. Dooley
KARI A. DOOLEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2