Dickens v. Taylor, et al

Filing 242

MEMORANDUM ORDER re remaining defendants and claims. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 4/4/13. (ntl)

Download PDF
I l IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE KEVIN L. DICKENS, Plaintiff, V. C.A. No. 04-00201-LPS COMMISSIONER STAN TAYLOR, eta!., Defendants MEMORANDUM ORDER At Wilmington this 4th day of April, 2013: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The parties have failed to agree as to which claims against which Defendants remain in this case. (See, e.g., D.l. 226 at 21-24; D.I. 227 at 1-2; D.l. 230 at 1-2; D.l. 231 at 11) Having reviewed the case docket- including the March 4, 2004 complaint (D.I. 2), November 3, 2006 screening order and memorandum opinion (D.I. 31; D.I. 32), the Court's April 29, 2008 description of the screening order (D.I. 83), the Court's November 24, 2009 rulings on dispositive motions (D.I. 167; D.I. 168), the parties' recent filings outlining their positions (identified by docket numbers above), and the Court's ruling in its April3, 2013 Order dismissing Defendants Howard, Sagers, Secord, and Taylor (D.I. 241) -the Court finds that, as to the State Defendants, only the following claims against the following Defendants remain to be tried and will be the subject of the trial to commence on April15, 2013: 1. a. Count A failure to protect against Defendants Harvey and Rainey. b. Count A excessive force on October 14, 2003 against Defendants Gardels, I Stanton, and Evans. t ~ c. Count A conditions of confinement against Defendant Evans. 2. Count B medical needs against Defendant Carroll. 3. Count C access to courts against Defendant Oney. 4. a. Count D retaliation against Defendant Tyson. b. Count D failure to protect against Defendants Cunningham, Belanger, Drake, Burton, and Carroll. l I 5. Further, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the following individuals as defendants on the Court docket, as no claims are pending against them: a. Betty Burris b. Major Holman c. Jayme Jackson d. Brian Engram e. Cpl. Kromka

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?