Langdon v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 73

Langdon v. Google Inc. et al

Doc. 73

Case 1:06-cv-00319-JJF

Document 73

Filed 02/28/2007

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE CHRISTOPHER LANGDON, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., d.b.a DELAWARE GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., AOL LLC, and MICROSOFT CORP., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C.A. No. 06 - 319 (JJF)

DEFENDANTS YAHOO! INC.'S AND MICROSOFT CORP.'S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE FOR REARGUMENT Yahoo! Inc. and Microsoft Corp. normally would consent to Mr. Langdon's request for extension due to adverse personal circumstances, but they are barred by court rule from doing so. "The 10-day limit for filing motions to alter or amend may not be altered, waived, or amended by the court." MOORE'S FEDERAL PRACTICE 3d § 59.31[2] (citations omitted) (emphasis added). "The specified time periods for filing a Rule 59(e) motion ... are mandatory and jurisdictional; therefore, the failure to meet the 10-day deadline to alter or amend a judgment is fatal and compels the denial of the Rule 59(e) motion." Id. at §. 59.31[4] (citations omitted) (emphasis added). DUANE MORRIS LLP /s/ Daniel V. Folt Daniel V. Folt (I.D. # 3143) Gary W. Lipkin (I.D. # 4044) 1100 North Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801-1246 302-657-4900 (phone) 302-657-4901 (fax) Dated: February 28, 2007 Attorneys for Yahoo! Inc., and Microsoft Corp.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 1:06-cv-00319-JJF

Document 73

Filed 02/28/2007

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Daniel V. Folt, do hereby certify that on February 28, 2007, copies of the foregoing Response to Motion for Extension of Time to File for Reargument were served on the following parties in the manner indicated below: Via Federal Express (signature required) Christopher Langdon 1835 Edwin Blvd. Winter Park, FL 32789 Via e-filing Kurt Michael Heyman, Esq. Proctor Heyman LLP 1116 West Street Wilmington, DE 19801 [phone]

/s/ Daniel V. Folt (Del. Bar No. 3143) Daniel V. Folt