Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Filing 305

ORDER re 303 in camera review of documents. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 7/29/11. (ntl)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

PERSONALIZED USER MODEL,
L.L.P.,

Plaintiff,

v.

09-525-LPS

GOOGLE, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER

Having reviewed the emails filed by Plaintiff for in camera review (D.I. 303), pursuant to
the Court's direction during the teleconference held on July 27, 2011,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.

Privileged Document 10 (PRlV 988) shall be produced, in the redacted form

attached to this Order, and without the attachment. This email is a transmittal email and.as
redacted, not privileged.
2.

Privileged Document 12 (PRlV 990) need NOT be produced. A portion of it is

redundant of Privileged Document 10, and the remaining portion is a privileged communication.
The privilege has not been waived with respect to this communication.
3.

Privileged Document 13 (PRlV 991) need NOT be produced. A portion ofit is

redundant of Privileged Document 10, and the remaining portion is a privileged communication.
The privilege has not been waived with respect to this communication.
4.

Privileged Document 14 (PRlV 992) shall be produced, in the redacted form

attached to this Order, without the attachment. This email is a transmittal email and, as redacted,
not privileged. The redacted portion is a privileged communication, and the privilege has not

r

I
I
been waived with respect to this communication.
5.

With respect to Privileged Document 15 (PRIV 993), the Court cannot determine

from the face of the document whether it is privileged. Plaintiff shall submit, for in camera
review, a letter not to exceed two pages setting out the basis for Plaintiffs belief that it has met
its burden to prove that the document is privileged and need not be produced due to waiver.
PLAINTIFF'S LETTER IS DUE BY AUGUST 1,2011.

6.

Privileged Document 16 (PRIV 994) need NOT be produced. A portion of it is

redundant of Privileged Document 14, and the remaining portion is a privileged communication.
The privilege has not been waived with respect to this communication.
7.

Privileged Document 17 (PRIV 995) need NOT be produced. It is redundant of

Privileged Document 14.
8.

Privileged Document 18 (PRIV 996) need NOT be produced. A portion of it is

redundant of Privileged Document 14, and the remaining portion is a privileged communication.
The privilege has not been waived with respect to this communication.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

r
I
~

I

I
~

i
~I

I

I.
I

I

Privileged Document 10

I
i

!

I
I
1

I

!
i

PRIV 988

page 1 01 1

I
Bennett, Jennifer D.
From:

Bennett, Jennifer D.

Sent:

Tuesday, February DB, 201110:10 AM

To:

[e-mail]; [e-mail]

Subject:

Revised in!errogatory response re conception and RTP

Roy and Yochai,
Please find attached a draft revised response to the interrogatory re conception and reduction to practice. Please
review the Fourth supplemental response and call me so we can talk through it and we can have it served today.
Thanks,

515/2011

Privileged Document 14

PRIV 992

.rage 1 01 L

Bennett, Jennifer D.
From:

Bennett, Jennifer D.

Sent:

Tuesday, February DB. 2011 1:37 PM

To:

[e-mail]; [e-mail]

Roy,

Thanks,

515/2011

Page 20f2

515/2011