Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.
Joint STIPULATION REGARDING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SCHEDULE re 32 Scheduling Order, by Google Inc.. (Moore, David)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, L.L.P.,
C.A. No. 09-525-LPS
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
STIPULATION REGARDING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SCHEDULE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties, subject to the approval
of the Court, that the April 12, 2010 Rule 16 Scheduling Order (D.I. 32), as amended by the
September 30, 2010 Stipulated Amended Scheduling Order (D.I. 104), the February 2, 2012
Order on Stipulation Regarding Expert Discovery Schedule (D.I. 353), the March 28, 2012
Amended Stipulation Regarding Expert Discovery Schedule (D.I. 359), the April 9, 2012 Order
on Stipulation Regarding Expert Discovery Schedule (D.I. 364), the June 15, 2012 Order on
Stipulation Regarding Expert Discovery Schedule, the July 16, 2012 Order on Stipulation
Regarding Expert Discovery Schedule, and the September 6, 2012 Order on Stipulation
Regarding Expert Discovery Schedule, shall be amended as follows:
Case dispositive motions
Oppositions to case dispositive
December 3, 2012
December 6, 2012
January 4, 20131
The deadlines for filing replies in support of case dispositive motions shall be as set forth in
the Local Rules, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties or ordered by the Court.
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL
POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
By: /s/ Jeremy A. Tigan
Karen Jacobs Louden (#2881)
Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239)
1201 N. Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
By: /s/ David E. Moore
Richard L. Horwitz (#2246)
David E. Moore (#3983)
Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor
1313 N. Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Tel: (302) 984-6000
Attorneys for Plaintiff Personalized User
Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc.
SO ORDERED this _______ day of __________, 2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?