Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Filing 443

Joint STIPULATION Regarding Motions Schedule by Google Inc., Personalized User Model LLP. (Louden, Karen)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, L.L.P., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. C.A. No. 09-525-LPS STIPULATION REGARDING MOTIONS SCHEDULE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that the November 30, 2012 Order on Stipulation Regarding Dispositive Motion Schedule shall be amended as follows: Activity Oppositions to case dispositive motions Replies in support of case dispositive motions Former Date January 4, 2012 New Date January 14, 2013 February 8, 2013 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and among the parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that the briefing schedule on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Dr. Jordan’s Late-Disclosed Opinions (Dkt. No. 421) shall be as follows: Activity Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Dr. Jordan’s Late-Disclosed Opinions (Dkt. No. 421) Reply in support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Dr. Jordan’s Late-Disclosed Opinions (Dkt. No. 421) Former Date December 26, 2012 New Date January 14, 2013 February 8, 2013 1 MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP /s/ Karen Jacobs Louden /s/ Richard L. Horwitz Karen Jacobs Louden (#2881) Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239) 1201 N. Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 (302) 658-9200 klouden@mnat.com jtigan@mnat.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Personalized User Model, L.L.P. Richard L. Horwitz (#2246) David E. Moore (#3983) Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor 1313 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 984-6000 rhorwitz@potteranderson.com dmoore@potteranderson.com Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc. SO ORDERED this _______ day of __________, 2012. ___________________________________ Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?