Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.
Filing
443
Joint STIPULATION Regarding Motions Schedule by Google Inc., Personalized User Model LLP. (Louden, Karen)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, L.L.P.,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
C.A. No. 09-525-LPS
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTIONS SCHEDULE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties, subject to the approval
of the Court, that the November 30, 2012 Order on Stipulation Regarding Dispositive Motion
Schedule shall be amended as follows:
Activity
Oppositions to case dispositive
motions
Replies in support of case dispositive
motions
Former Date
January 4, 2012
New Date
January 14, 2013
February 8, 2013
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and among the parties, subject to the
approval of the Court, that the briefing schedule on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Dr. Jordan’s
Late-Disclosed Opinions (Dkt. No. 421) shall be as follows:
Activity
Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to
Strike Dr. Jordan’s Late-Disclosed
Opinions (Dkt. No. 421)
Reply in support of Plaintiff’s Motion
to Strike Dr. Jordan’s Late-Disclosed
Opinions (Dkt. No. 421)
Former Date
December 26, 2012
New Date
January 14, 2013
February 8, 2013
1
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
/s/ Karen Jacobs Louden
/s/ Richard L. Horwitz
Karen Jacobs Louden (#2881)
Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239)
1201 N. Market Street
P.O. Box 1347
Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
(302) 658-9200
klouden@mnat.com
jtigan@mnat.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Personalized User Model, L.L.P.
Richard L. Horwitz (#2246)
David E. Moore (#3983)
Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor
1313 N. Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
(302) 984-6000
rhorwitz@potteranderson.com
dmoore@potteranderson.com
Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc.
SO ORDERED this _______ day of __________, 2012.
___________________________________
Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?