Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Filing 55

STIPULATION and Order to Amend Scheduling Order re 32 Scheduling Order, by Google Inc., Personalized User Model LLP. (Tigan, Jeremy)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, L.L.P., Plaint iff, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 09-525 (JJF) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER WHEREAS, the parties have further discussed the timing of document production and other discovery, and believe certain provisions in the Court's Scheduling Order (D.I. 32) should be amended for the efficient administration of discovery and the claim construction process; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that the Scheduling Order (D.I. 32) shall be amended as follows: Activity Former Date New Date Parties exchange claim construction positions Due date for opening claim construction brief Due date for responsive claim construction brief July 16, 2010 August 13, 2010 September 17, 2010 August 27, 2010 September 17, 2010 October 22, 2010 All remaining dates, including the December 2010 Markman hearing, remain unchanged. MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP /s/ Jeremy A. Tigan ________________________________________ Karen Jacobs Louden (#2881) Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239) 1201 N. Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 (302) 658-9200 klouden@mnat.com jt igan@mnat.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Personalized User Model, L.L.P. /s/ David E. Moore ___________________________________ Richard L. Horwitz (#2246) David E. Moore (#3983) Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor 1313 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 984-6000 rhorwitz@potteranderson.com dmoore@potteranderson.com Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc. SO ORDERED this _______ day of __________, 2010. ___________________________________ United States District Judge 3585758

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?