Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Filing 624

ORDER re motion to exclude certain opinions of Dr. Michael Pazzani. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/4/14. (ntl)

Download PDF
I I Case 1:09-cv-00525-LPS Document 613 Filed 03/03/14 Page 1of2 PagelD #: 18316 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, L.L.P., 1 Plaintiff: v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. GOOGLE, INC., Counterclaimant, v. PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, L.L.P. and YOCHAI KONIG, Counterclaim-Defendants. I I l ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 09-525 (LPS) Pursuant to the Court's Order (D.I. 606), granting in part and denying in part Google's Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of Dr. Michael Pazzani, the Court strikes the following portions of Dr. Pazzani's expert report: • On page 7, the title in the table of contents, "SRI DID NOT ACQUIRE RIGHTS TO THE INVENTIONS IN THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT'; • Paragraph 2; • The following sentence from paragraph 6: "In addition, as part of my job at Rutgers, I oversee the technology commercialization office and interpret Rutgers patent policy"; • On page 284, the heading "SRI DID NOT ACQUIRE RIGHTS TO THE INVENTIONS IN THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT"; • Paragraph 577; l .. Case 1:09-cv-00525-LPS Document 613 Filed 03/03/14 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #: 18317 t I I ' • The second and third sentences of paragraph 578. SOORDEREDthis Y.~yof 11 ~ ~~,(~ arch2014. UNITED TATES DISTRICT JUDGE l 1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?