Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Filing 625

ORDER regarding PUM's motion in limine on ownership issues. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/5/14. (ntl)

Download PDF
,.I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) GOOGLE, INC., ) ) Defendant. ______________ ) ) GOOGLE, INC., ) ) Counterclaimant, ) ) v. ) ) PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, L.L.P. ) and YOCHAI KONIG, ) Counterclaim-Defendants. () PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, L.L.P., 1 - ' Q:~~ PUM'S [PROPOS)gij)ORDERREGARDING PUM'S MOTION IN LIM/NE ON OWNERSHIP ISSUES I 1 The Court having considered PUM's motion in limine No. 1 concerning trial on cl l C.A. No. 09-525 (LPS) ownership issues (D.I. 588, Ex. 12), and in furtherance to the Court's February 27, 2014 Order ruling on the motions in limine (D.I. 606), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1) Google shall not present evidence or argument to the jury that Google is a rightful owner of the patents-in-suit or will become an owner of the patents-in-suit should the I I ~ jury find that Dr. Konig breached his employment agreement by failing to assign the invention to SRI; 2) Google shall not present evidence or argument to the jury that PUM will or may lose ownership of the patents-in-suit; 3) Notwithstanding the foregoing, Google is not precluded from posing questions or arguing on cross examination of the inventors that PUM had an incentive to change position as to the conception date of the invention because of an alleged concern that Google might attempt to assert co-ownership rights in the patents; and 4) Nothing in this Order shall preclude either party from relying on the SRI/Google Purchase Agreement for any relevant purpose, including but not limited to Google rebutting evidence or argument by PUM that Google does not have standing to assert a breach of contract claim against Konig, but Google shall not argue that it actually holds rights in the patents or will obtain any rights as a consequence of its breach of contract claim. f SO ORDERED this __) ..+-1/'"\. day of March 2014. !\ ) / J-c UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?