Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Filing 688

Letter to The Honorable Leonard P. Stark from Karen Jacobs regarding Post Trial Briefing. (Jacobs, Karen)

Download PDF
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP 1201 N ORTH M ARKET S TREET P.O. B OX 1347 W ILMINGTON , D ELAWARE 19899-1347 (302) 658-9200 (302) 658-3989 FAX KAREN JACOBS (302) 351-9227 April 16, 2014 The Honorable Leonard P. Stark United States District Court 844 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Re: VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Personalized User Model, L.L.P. v. Google, Inc. C.A. No. 09-525 (LPS) Dear Judge Stark: As Thursday, April 17, 2014 is the 28th day since the jury rendered its verdict in this case, we write on behalf of PUM to confirm our understanding that the time for filing post-trial motions pursuant to pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) and 59 has not yet begun to run because no judgment has yet been entered. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(b) (stating that the time for filing such motions is “no later than 28 days after the entry of judgment”); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) (same). Thus, the jury verdict alone does not trigger the statutory time period for filing these motions, and the time period for briefing to be set by the Court will only begin to run following entry of judgment. PUM provided this letter to Google, and Google responded that it believes this letter to be unnecessary as the deadlines are clear from the rules. Respectfully, /s/ Karen Jacobs Karen Jacobs (#2881) cc: Clerk of the Court (by hand) All Counsel of Record (by e-mail)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?