Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.
Filing
700
NOTICE of Intent to Request Redaction by David Ellis Moore re 697 Transcript,, 696 Transcript,, 698 Transcript,, 692 Transcript,, 699 Transcript,, 695 Transcript,, 691 Transcript,, 693 Transcript,, 694 Transcript,, (Moore, David)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, L.L.P.,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
GOOGLE, INC.
Counterclaimant,
v.
PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, LLP and
YOCHAI KONIG
Counterdefendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
C.A. No. 09-525-LPS
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO REDACT
Defendant Google Inc. ("Google"), by and through its undersigned counsel, pursuant to
Rule 5.2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s policy on the electronic
availability of transcripts of court proceedings, hereby submits its Notice of Intent to Redact
regarding the trial transcripts from the jury trial held on March 10, 2014 through March 20, 2014
(D.I. 691, 692, 693, 694, 695, 696, 697, 698, and 699.)
OF COUNSEL:
Charles K. Verhoeven
David A. Perlson
Antonio R. Sistos
Margaret Pirnie Kammerud
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
& SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel.: (415) 875-6600
Joshua Lee Sohn
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
& SULLIVAN, LLP
777 6th Street NW, 11th Floor
Washington, DC 20001-3706
Tel: (202) 538-8000
Andrea Pallios Roberts
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
& SULLIVAN, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel.: (650) 801-5000
Dated: May 6, 2014
1151580 / 34638
POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
By: /s/ David E. Moore
Richard L. Horwitz (#2246)
David E. Moore (#3983)
Erich W. Struble (#5394)
Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor
1313 N. Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Tel: (302) 984-6000
rhorwitz@potteranderson.com
dmoore@potteranderson.com
estruble@potteranderson.com
Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?