Personalized User Model LLP v. Google Inc.

Filing 700

NOTICE of Intent to Request Redaction by David Ellis Moore re 697 Transcript,, 696 Transcript,, 698 Transcript,, 692 Transcript,, 699 Transcript,, 695 Transcript,, 691 Transcript,, 693 Transcript,, 694 Transcript,, (Moore, David)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, L.L.P., Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. GOOGLE, INC. Counterclaimant, v. PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, LLP and YOCHAI KONIG Counterdefendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 09-525-LPS JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO REDACT Defendant Google Inc. ("Google"), by and through its undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rule 5.2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s policy on the electronic availability of transcripts of court proceedings, hereby submits its Notice of Intent to Redact regarding the trial transcripts from the jury trial held on March 10, 2014 through March 20, 2014 (D.I. 691, 692, 693, 694, 695, 696, 697, 698, and 699.) OF COUNSEL: Charles K. Verhoeven David A. Perlson Antonio R. Sistos Margaret Pirnie Kammerud QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California St. San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel.: (415) 875-6600 Joshua Lee Sohn QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 777 6th Street NW, 11th Floor Washington, DC 20001-3706 Tel: (202) 538-8000 Andrea Pallios Roberts QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Tel.: (650) 801-5000 Dated: May 6, 2014 1151580 / 34638 POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP By: /s/ David E. Moore Richard L. Horwitz (#2246) David E. Moore (#3983) Erich W. Struble (#5394) Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor 1313 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Tel: (302) 984-6000 rhorwitz@potteranderson.com dmoore@potteranderson.com estruble@potteranderson.com Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?