Xpoint Technologies Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation et al

Filing 56

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE XPOINT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORP., et al., Defendants. STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. ("Freescale"), Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. ("Marvell"), and Sprint Nextel Corporation ("Sprint") are currently in negotiations regarding a response date to the Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiff, Freescale, Marvell, and Sprint, subject to the approval of the Court, that, Freescale, Marvell, and Sprint's time to answer, move against or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint in this action shall be extended to and including October 23, 2009. Civil Action No. 09-CV-00628 (SLR)

{BMF-W0160599.}

1

BOUCHARD MARGULES & FRIEDLANDER, P.A. /s/ Sean M. Brennecke David J. Margules (#2254) Sean M. Brennecke (#4686) 222 Delaware Ave., Suite 1400 Wilmington, DE 19801 [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff Xpoint Technologies, Inc. SPRINT NEXTEL CORP. /s/ Lee Lauridsen Lee Lauridsen Senior Counsel Sprint Nextel Corp. 6450 Sprint Parkway Overland Park, KS [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Sprint Nextel Corp.

BRACEWELL & GIULIANI LLP /s/ Alan Albright Alan Albright 111 Congress Avenue, Suite 2300 Austin, TX 78701 [phone] [e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendant Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. /s/ Jinping Yang Jinping Yang IP Counsel Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. 5488 Marvell Lane Santa Clara, CA 95054 [phone] [e-mail] Attorney for Defendant Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.

SO ORDERED, this

day of

, 2009.

__________________________________ Judge

{BMF-W0160599.}

2