Xpoint Technologies Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation et al

Filing 83

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Marvell to Answer Amended Complaint to December 18, 2009 - filed by Xpoint Technologies Inc.. (Brennecke, Sean)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE XPOINT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORP., et al., Defendants. STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiff and Defendant Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. ("Marvell"), subject to the approval of the Court, that: 1. Marvell waives in the above-captioned case, any defenses or objections to Civil Action No. 09-CV-00628 (SLR) personal jurisdiction, any defect in the Summons, and service of the Summons, August 21, 2009 Complaint, and September 18, 2009 Amended Complaint. 2. Marvell's time to answer, move against or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint in this action shall be extended to and including December 18, 2009. 1 BOUCHARD MARGULES & FRIEDLANDER, P.A. /s/ Sean M. Brennecke David J. Margules (#2254) Sean M. Brennecke (#4686) 222 Delaware Ave., Suite 1400 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 573-3500 dmargules@bmf-law.com sbrennecke@bmf-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Xpoint Technologies, Inc. ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A. /s/ John G. Day John G. Day (#2403) Tiffany Geyer Lydon (#3950) Caroline Hong (#5189) 500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor P.O. Box 1150 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 654-1888 jday@ashby-geddes.com tlydon@ashby-geddes.com chong@ashby-geddes.com Attorney for Defendant Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. SO ORDERED, this day of , 2009. __________________________________ Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?