Lilly v. Astrue

Filing 29

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (CASE CLOSED) -- adopting 28 Report and Recommendation; granting in part 17 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 23 Motion for Summary Judgment; the matter is remanded for further analysis. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/1/12. (ntl)

Download PDF
I I 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SUSAN D. LILLY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 10-30-LPS-MPT v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant. ORDER At Wilmington this 1 ~ T day of March, 2012. WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge Thynge issued a Report and Recommendation (D.I. 28) dated January 30, 2012; WHEREAS, the Report and Recommendation recommends that (1) Defendant's motion for summary judgment (D.I. 23) be DENIED; (2) Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (D.I. 17) be GRANTED in part; (3) the matter be remanded for further analysis; and (4) Plaintiffs request for an award ofbenefits (D.I. 18) be DENIED. WHEREAS, any Objections to the Report and Recommendation (D.I. 28) were to be filed by Februay 16, 2012; WHEREAS, neither party has filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation; WHEREAS, the Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation should be I I I I j adopted for the reasons stated by Magistrate Judge Thynge; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (D.I. 28) is ADOPTED; and Defendant's motion for summary judgment (D.I. 23) is DENIED; (2) Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (D.I. 17) is GRANTED in part; (3) the matter is remanded for further analysis; and (4) Plaintiffs request for an award ofbenefits (D.I. 18) is DENIED. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?