Xerox Corporation v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 130

STIPULATION of Dismissal of Claims Related to '994 Patent by Xerox Corporation. (Day, John)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE XEROX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., RIGHT MEDIA INC., RIGHT MEDIA LLC, YOUTUBE, INC., and YOUTUBE, LLC, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 10-136-LPS-MPT STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ALL PENDING CLAIMS, DEFENSES, AND COUNTERCLAIMS RELATING TO THE `994 PATENT WHEREAS, in its March 29, 2010 Amended Complaint, plaintiff Xerox Corporation ("Xerox") asserted U.S. Patent No. 6,236,994 ("the `994 Patent") against defendants Google Inc., Yahoo! Inc. and YouTube, LLC (collectively, "the `994 Defendants") (D.I. 19, Counts 2, 4 and 6); WHEREAS the `994 Defendants have responded to the allegations of infringement of the `994 Patent and have asserted counterclaims and defenses relating to the `994 Patent (D.I. 24, Counterclaims 2, 3 and 5; D.I. 27, Counterclaims 2 and 4); WHEREAS Xerox has agreed to withdraw the `994 Patent from this case and to the dismissal with prejudice of its causes of action relating thereto; WHEREAS the `994 Defendants have agreed to withdraw from this case, and to the dismissal with prejudice of, their counterclaims relating to the `994 Patent, subject to the parties' understanding and agreement that such withdrawal and dismissal shall not preclude any of the `994 Defendants from asserting in the future the same or similar counterclaims and related {00494202;v1} defenses against anyone who in the future alleges infringement by such `994 Defendant of the `994 Patent; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to the approval of the Court, that: (1) Xerox's causes of action relating to the `994 Patent (D.I. 19, Counts 2, 4 and 6) are hereby dismissed with prejudice; (2) The `994 Defendants' counterclaims relating to the `994 Patent (D.I. 24, Counterclaims 2, 3 and 5; D.I. 27, Counterclaims 2 and 4) are hereby dismissed with prejudice; (3) The `994 Defendants shall not be precluded from asserting in the future the same or similar counterclaims and related defenses against anyone who in the future alleges infringement by such `994 Defendant of the `994 Patent. ASHBY & GEDDES /s/ John G. Day Lawrence C. Ashby (#468) John G. Day (#2403) Lauren E. Maguire (#4261) 500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor Wilmington, DE 19899 Tel: (302) 654-1888 lashby@ashby-geddes.com jday@ashby-geddes.com lmaguire@ashby-geddes.com POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP /s/ Richard L. Horwitz Richard L. Horwitz (#2246) David E. Moore (33983) Hercules Plaza 6th Floor 1313 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19899 rhorwitz@potteranderson.com dmoore@potteranderson.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Xerox Corporation Attorneys for Defendants Google Inc., YouTube, Inc. and YouTube, LLC {00494202;v1} 2 MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP /s/ Maryellen Noreika Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014) Maryellen Noreika (#3208) Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239) 1201 North Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 658-9200 jblumenfeld@mnat.com mnoreika@mnat.com jtigan@mnat.com Attorneys For Defendants Yahoo! Inc. and Right Media LLC IT IS SO ORDERED this ___ day of March, 2010. United States District Judge {00494202;v1} 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?