Xerox Corporation v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 291

SO ORDERED, re 290 Stipulation and Order for Dismissal filed by Xerox Corporation, Yahoo! Inc., ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 12/14/11. (ntl)

Download PDF
i Case 1:1 0-cv-00136-LPS Document 290 Filed 12/13/11 Page 1 of 2 PageiD #: 4451 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE XEROX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 10-136-LPS ~ ) GOOGLE INC. ANDYAHOO! INC., Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs. ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Xerox Corporation, and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Yahoo! Inc., hereby stipulate by and through their respective attorneys that, pursuant to Rules 41(a) and 41(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all claims against Yahoo! in the above-entitled action are dismissed with prejudice and Yahoo!'s counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice subject to the parties' understanding and agreement that such withdrawal and dismissal shall not preclude Yahoo! from asserting in the future the same or similar counterclaims and related defenses against anyone who in the future alleges infringement by Yahoo! of the Patent in suit in this matter, without costs or attorneys' fees to either party. {00583344;vl} Case 1:1 0-cv-00136-LPS Document 290 Filed 12/13/11 Page 2 of 2 PageiD #: 4452 ASHBY & GEDDES MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP Is/ Lauren E. Maguire Is/ Maryellen Noreika Lawrence C. Ashby (#468) John G. Day (#2403) Lauren E. Maguire (#4261) 500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor P.O. Box 1150 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 654-1888 Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014) Maryellen Noreika (#3208) Jeremy A. Tigan (#5239) 1201 North Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 658-9200 Attorneys for PlaintiffXerox Corporation Attorneys for Defendants Yahoo! Inc. {00583344;v I}

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?